Repository LOGO
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Intellectual Repository at Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon
    • Faculty and Institute (คณะและสถาบัน)
    • Institute of Research and Development
    • Journal Articles
    • View Item
    •   Intellectual Repository at Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon
    • Faculty and Institute (คณะและสถาบัน)
    • Institute of Research and Development
    • Journal Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Six sigma quality information models for disease monitor prevention and control for the department of disease control ministry

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    IRD_59_29.pdf (336.2Kb)
    Date
    2016-09-12
    Author
    รวิพร บุศยศิริ
    วจี ชูกิตติกุล
    ทัดทอง พราหมมณี
    จารึก ชูกิตติกุล
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This research aims to 1) set up analysis procedures and define the Information. 2) to Apply DMAIC to the information. 3) to comprehend the number of information models. 4) to Study the acceptance of Information models. And 5) to analyze the acceptance of the Six Sigma Quality indicators . Sample group consisted of 116 people included high-ranking executives, middle executives, specialistsand operational executives. The simple random sampling from the population of 424 people. The tools used in this research comprise the information models, content correctness assessment forms, acceptance assessment forms, the information models and indicators. The results have shown that 1) the process for analyzing and defining the information consists of four procedures 2) the Information models can be formed with the five steps of DMAIC 3) applying DMAIC has shown that 42 models 4) The number of the populations accepting the models is higher than that of those who do not accept them, with statistical significance at .05 level. And 5) The number of the respondents accepting the indicators is higher than that of those who do not accept them, with statistical significance at.05 level.
    URI
    http://repository.rmutp.ac.th/handle/123456789/2055
    Collections
    • Journal Articles [688]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     


    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV